Martin Eden
Well-known member
I think it was Thrash. Great trade: Franchise QB for Jamari Thrash. You kind of have to add that to the worst trade in NFL history. Baker, 3 #1s, a shit load of money for Watson and Jamari Thrash.
CBD had the Titans beat writer on. Says they have 5 options at the 1st overall
Ward
Sanders
Travis Hunter
Abdul Carter
A trade
I mean. This draft better not go
Titans : QB
Browns : non-QB
Giants : QB
We have a conference that goes through Lamar, Joe, Patrick and Josh. Need to keep swinging.
I agree. His point on highly drafted QB’s was so far fetched. Really poor critical thinking.The guy was pretty irritating to listen to. He wouldn't admit that QB is super important and was trying to play the, "you can find a QB anywhere card". He definitely cherry picked stats for the subject. Now we know why the Titans stink...they don't think QB is important either.
It wouldn't surprise me at all if the Giants move up and take Sanders. Titans have a ways to go and getting more picks and going with Levis one more year is pretty reasonable.
It wouldn't be about sticking with Levis. It would be about not rating Ward or Sanders worth the 1st pick and playing for next draft and a QB they really want. I wouldn't hate it if the Browns did the same thing. But I think we're taking whichever is there at #2. But without question, I hope we get Sanders.The Titans reporter claimed he had 17 quarterbacks ranked ahead of Levis who would be better for the team in 2025. He also suggested there are multiple free-agent options they believe could have a “Sam Darnold-type resurgence” (yikes) and he thought Darnold was a legit option for the Titans.
He made it sound like they prefer free agency over drafting a rookie because rookies sometimes fail—completely ignoring the fact that every free-agent QB is essentially a “failed” QB. As OCON said… really poor critical thinking.
Berry and Stefanski would be stupid to do this.It would be about not rating Ward or Sanders worth the 1st pick and playing for next draft and a QB they really want. I wouldn't hate it if the Browns did the same thing
They aren't going to get fired based on how a rookie plays, because he won't be playing ...our rookie QB will likely have zero effect.Berry and Stefanski would be stupid to do this.
They are looking for immediate results. If the Browns win 5 games or less this year, maybe even raise that number to 7, they are for sure fired.
I don't think so. This is all because of the Watson trade, not Stefanski's coaching. I'm not a huge fan, but he's competent. He's got the next two years in my opinion, unless the wheels come completely off. I think we're taking a QB and I think Stefanski's still got some slack.Berry and Stefanski would be stupid to do this.
They are looking for immediate results. If the Browns win 5 games or less this year, maybe even raise that number to 7, they are for sure fired.
It would be about not rating Ward or Sanders worth the 1st pick and playing for next draft and a QB they really want. I wouldn't hate it if the Browns did the same thing. But I think we're taking whichever is there at #2. But without question, I hope we get Sanders.
It's insanity.How is it that almost every mock draft I see has the Browns taking Abdul Carter? Really?