Topic of the Day | Page 29 | Barking Hard

Topic of the Day

Untitled.jpg

...Here I will be crystal clear: It cannot be made a crime to hate someone else, for whatever reason, or to announce one’s hatred in public. These are our rights, repellently exercised or otherwise. If the ACLU had not devolved into a nest of identitarian flunkies, it would say this plainly and your columnist would not have to...
 
But why should our tax dollars go to this BS endless war?! The Establishment created a crisis and manipulated the whole population. These events have been going on for years. All they did was pick one and ran with it. They could've gone back years and done the same thing. Why all of a sudden now?

A: Elections. They're afraid Trump gets elected and he cuts off the welfare/warfare states of Israel, Syria and Ukraine subsequently ending the flow of our tax dollars to the Establishment as they know it.
 
But why should our tax dollars go to this BS endless war?!
Because we rule the world. for now still.
The Establishment created a crisis and manipulated the whole population. These events have been going on for years. All they did was pick one and ran with it. They could've gone back years and done the same thing.
It's not easy to write 100 words to lay all this out. you have described Ukraine. will that do ?
Why all of a sudden now?
A: Elections. They're afraid Trump gets elected and he cuts off the welfare/warfare states of Israel, Syria and Ukraine subsequently ending the flow of our tax dollars to the Establishment as they know it.
Syria can't go on forever. just to little invested.
But Trump will have no more power than before. meaning very little change. He supports Israel more than the Dem's. there will be peace in Ukraine someday. what will it look like ? is the only Question. war would not of happened under Trump. he would've took a beating for it if not killed. Putin wasn't asking for much. he's paid dearly for what he started. but he had no choice.
 
Untitled.jpg

...We give 3.8 billion annually in military aid to Israel. Congress is considering a 14.3 billion ADDITIONAL aid package!...


Why? Israel can take care of itself and fight it's own wars with all that money we've given to them before October.
It's a fucking scam to take out tax dollars and hand it over to the Establishment. Taxation without representation.
 
Last edited:
Untitled.jpg
By Dave DeCamp / Antiwar.com

On Wednesday, the Senate passed the mammoth $886 billion 2024 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which funds the Pentagon and military spending in other government agencies.

The bill passed in a vote of 87-13, with six Democrats, six Republicans, and one Independent voting against it...the House...is expected to pass...the bill...

The NDAA...has enabled mass surveillance of Americans and is set to expire at the end of the year, this pushes it back to April 19.
...senators tried to strip the Section 702 extension from the NDAA...41 senators were needed to remove the provision, but only 35 supported it.

...the Biden administration is struggling to get Republicans to support a massive $111 billion...for military aid for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan. But Republicans are holding out until Democrats agree to significant changes in US border policies...
 
Untitled.jpg

The US military has occupied Syrian sovereign territory since 2014, preventing Damascus from accessing its own oil and wheat fields.

A top Pentagon official has acknowledged that Washington’s strategy is to starve Syria’s central government of revenue it needs to rebuild, after a decade of war fueled by foreign powers devastated the country.

Former US President Donald Trump boasted in 2020: “They say, ‘He left troops in Syria’. You know what I did? I left troops to take the oil. I took the oil. The only troops I have are taking the oil. They’re protecting the oil. I took over the oil”.

The United States has at least 900 troops in Syria. Syria’s internationally recognized government has repeatedly called for them to leave, meaning the US military presence is illegal according to international law.

US Senate votes 13-84 against withdrawing troops from Syria​

This issue has come up in Congress several times in recent years.

On December 7, the Senate voted 13-84, rejecting a resolution to withdraw the US troops.

The joint resolution, S.J.Res.51, “direct[ed] the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities in Syria that have not been authorized by Congress”.

Of the 100 members of the Senate, which is roughly evenly split between both parties, seven Democrats voted for the resolution, along with one left-wing independent who caucuses with the Democrats (Bernie Sanders) and five Republicans.

The senators who voted to withdraw US troops from Syria were the following:

Democrats (7)

  • Dick Durbin (Illinois)
  • Ed Markey (Massachusetts)
  • Jeff Merkley (Oregon)
  • Chris Murphy (Connecticut)
  • Elizabeth Warren (Massachusetts)
  • Peter Welch (Vermont)
  • Ron Wyden (Oregon)
Independent (1)

  • Bernie Sanders (Vermont)
Republicans (5)

  • Mike Braun (Indiana)
  • Mike Lee (Utah)
  • Rand Paul (Kentucky)
  • Tommy Tuberville (Alabama)
  • JD Vance (Ohio)
The resolution had been introduced by Rand Paul, a libertarian-leaning Republican senator from Kentucky.

The proposed legislation noted that US military forces have been active in Syria since September 22, 2014.

Since 2016, the resolution disclosed, US troops in Syria have attacked the Syrian government and its allies, including Iranian and Russian fighters, at least 11 times.

Both the Donald Trump and Joe Biden administrations repeatedly launched airstrikes in Syria against government and allied forces.

US occupies Syria’s oil fields​

In March 2023, a senior United Nations official, Farhan Haq, inspired controversy when he falsely claimed “there’s no US armed forces inside of Syria”. (Chinese reporter Edward Xu corrected Haq’s lie, while calling out the UN’s hypocrisy on Ukraine.)

The US corporate media was once quite open about this fact.

Back in 2018, neoconservative Washington Post columnist Josh Rogin bragged, “In Syria, we ‘took the oil’”. He emphasized that “the United States and its partners control almost all of the oil” in the country.

Then President Trump had claimed at the time that he wanted to withdraw US troops from Syria, but Rogin complained that, “if the United States leaves, that oil will likely fall into the hands of Iran”.

Trump listened to hawkish critics like Rogin and decided to backtrack, instead leaving the US troops – who remain there today.

NPR stated clearly in 2020, “U.S. forces in northeastern Syria have a relatively new mission: securing oil fields not only from ISIS, but also from Syrian government and Russian forces”.

Trump sat down for an interview with Fox News host Laura Ingraham that same year. The US president explained:
In 2019, a neoconservative US government official overseeing Syria policy, Dana Stroul, boasted that “one-third of Syrian territory was owned via the US military, with its local partner the Syrian Democratic Forces”, or SDF.

The Kurdish-majority SDF have acted as a US proxy, using oil revenue to fund their separatist operations, destabilizing Syria’s central government.

As Geopolitical Economy Report editor Ben Norton wrote at the time, Stroul emphasized that this Syrian land “owned” by Washington was “resource-rich” and constituted the “economic powerhouse of Syria, so where the hydrocarbons are… as well as the agricultural powerhouse”, with many wheat fields.

When Biden entered office in 2021, his administration appointed Stroul as deputy assistant secretary of defense for the Middle East, the top Pentagon official crafting US policy for West Asia.

US continues to militarily occupy Iraq as well​

The United States had roughly 40,000 troops stationed in West Asia (known popularly as the Middle East), as of October 2023.

In addition to the 900 in Syria, the US has 2500 troops deployed to Iraq, where their presence also violates the country’s sovereignty and international law.

On January 3, 2020, US President Trump ordered a drone strike that assassinated top Iranian General Qasem Soleimani, along with a major Iraqi commander, Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis.

In response to Trump’s blatant act of war on its soil, Iraq’s democratically elected parliament voted in January 2020 to expel the US troops occupying the country.

Trump ignored the Iraqi parliament’s vote, instead threatening to impose sanctions on Baghdad.

Biden, a Democrat, has continued his Republican predecessor’s policy, prolonging the military occupation of both Iraq and Syria, in flagrant violation of the nations’ sovereignty.

The war in Gaza that broke out in October has also spilled over to other countries in the region.

In addition to indiscriminately killing Palestinian civilians, including thousands of children, in one of the most brutal bombing campaigns in history, Israel has also attacked Lebanon, and even bombed infrastructure in Syria, such as airports in Damascus and Aleppo.

This has led resistance forces in Syria and Iraq to launch attacks on the US troops illegally occupying their countries. The Biden administration responded with air strikes against these fighters.

According to the Pentagon, US troops in the region were attacked at least 52 times from October 17 to November 13.
 
Untitled.jpg

resolution in support of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was introduced in the United States House of Representatives on December 13.

Cosponsored by eight representatives, it states that “regular journalistic activities are protected under the First Amendment,” and the U.S. government should “drop all charges against and attempts to extradite Julian Assange.”

The resolution [PDF] introduced by six Republican and two Democratic representatives marks the second time that representatives have used the legislature to try and mobilize support for Assange and freedom of the press. (One was previously sponsored in 2020 by Republican Representatives Thomas Massie and Justin Amash and Democratic Representative Tulsi Gabbard.)...

...Australia is described as a “a critical United States ally and Mr. Assange’s native country,” and the country’s support for allowing Assange to return home is treated as crucial to bringing the case to an end.

The resolution concludes by stating that the U.S. government should abandon its effort to extradite Assange and put him on trial. It should also allow Assange to return home to Australia “if he so desires."

Whether the resolution will pass in the House or not, the resolution shows the potential for making the Assange case a political issue for President Joe Biden. In a year where Biden will be campaigning for re-election, that may prove to be crucial in freeing Assange.
 

On Trump and Colorado

Notes on a state ruling, and a coming Racket story​

DEC 20
By now most readers will have heard that Donald Trump was disqualified from the ballot in the state of Colorado, by the Colorado State Supreme Court, for what amounts to a criminal offense neither proven nor charged. Fifth Amendment, Schmifth Amendment, apparently.
This is a major escalation of the lawfare phenomenon that’s zoomed from simmer to boil in the seven short years since Trump was first elected in 2016. The glee of #Resistance dolts like Robert Reich and Dean Obeidallah at this decision shows that this was a move dreamed up at the very center of the bubble-within-a-bubble-within-a-bubble that is the blob of the modern Democratic Party. Racket readers, I had a piece planned for later on a quasi-related subject, but I’ll try to get it out in the day or so now.
What a crazy effing country this is…​
 

On Trump and Colorado


Notes on a state ruling, and a coming Racket story​

DEC 20
By now most readers will have heard that Donald Trump was disqualified from the ballot in the state of Colorado, by the Colorado State Supreme Court, for what amounts to a criminal offense neither proven nor charged. Fifth Amendment, Schmifth Amendment, apparently.
This is a major escalation of the lawfare phenomenon that’s zoomed from simmer to boil in the seven short years since Trump was first elected in 2016. The glee of #Resistance dolts like Robert Reich and Dean Obeidallah at this decision shows that this was a move dreamed up at the very center of the bubble-within-a-bubble-within-a-bubble that is the blob of the modern Democratic Party. Racket readers, I had a piece planned for later on a quasi-related subject, but I’ll try to get it out in the day or so now.
What a crazy effing country this is…
My Aunt is one of Donald Trumps speech writers.. They , The Demonrats tried an assassination attempt during the DNC here in Cleveland and targeted him,Melania and his grandson Barron.. That's all you need to know...
 
Untitled.jpg

Jared Golden, a Democratic congressman from Lewiston who voted to impeach Trump over the January 6th riots, quickly issued a statement:

We are a nation of laws, therefore until he is actually found guilty of the crime of insurrection, he should be allowed on the ballot.
Eight years ago this month, the big story in the presidential race was whether or not Trump was out of line in saying Hillary Clinton got “schlonged” in the 2008 primary. A Washington Postlinguistic investigation” quoted Steven Pinker in saying that “given Trump’s history of vulgarity… it’s entirely possible that he had created a sexist term for ‘defeat,’” but the paper concluded that Trump’s problem was that “he’s a gentile who, linguistically, may have wandered too far from home.”

Normally campaign season is a period of heightened engagement, as people scour the Internet to research even the most inane questions, knowing that at the end of the process, they get to cast votes on them. It’s why news companies tend to fatten up in election years, like Grizzlies during salmon runs. People are absorbed by dramas in which they feel themselves to be participants.

This year the public is being forced to research questions in which they have no say. We all understand now that there’s a disqualification clause in the 14th Amendment. We also understand that this clause seems to have been written with deliberate vagueness. I’m no lawyer, but I doubt the 14th Amendment was designed to empower unelected state officials to unilaterally strike major party frontrunners from the presidential ballot. If it was, that’s a shock. I must have missed that in AP Insane Legal Loopholes class. Is there any way this ends well? It feels harder and harder to imagine.
 
Back
Top Bottom