The " Book It " thread! | Page 24 | Barking Hard

The " Book It " thread!

Food Banks

Seen all the people at the Food Banks ?
Many of these people had worked from paycheck to paycheck. without ever getting a check, in our underground economy.
How Big Is the Underground Economy?
Estimates vary widely, but some put the underground economy at 11% to 12% of U.S. gross domestic product (GDP). In 2018, GDP was $20.5 trillion, so that puts the underground economy at about $2.25 trillion to $2.46 trillion.
 
April 25, 2020 - 5:29 pm
A CES 2020 attendee who reportedly developed flu-like symptoms after returning home from the conference in January says he found out Monday that his COVID-19 antibody test came back positive.

The news, reported Thursday by American Public Media, is renewing social media speculation about whether the virus was circulating at the consumer electronics show, which drew more than 175,000 attendees from across the globe to Las Vegas from Jan. 7-10.

After CES 2020 ended in January, a handful of attendees posted on Twitter about how they were sick with flu-like symptoms.

In a Jan. 10 post, Webber wrote: “The lounge at the #LasVegas airport sounds like an infirmary: all sorts of people sneezing & coughing. I think there are 3 reasons for this. 1) hard partying from #CES2020 2) global travelers from many regions in flu season 3) prevalence of conditioned indoor air in LV.”

On Thursday, Webber posted a link to the American Public Media story on Twitter with the comment, “so, it turns out I did have the zombie virus after all.”

Other Twitter users weighed in on the topic this week, too. On Friday, @technosucks wrote: “I went to CES 2020. Then I got super sick. Worst ‘flu’ of my life.”

Also on Friday, @acapata wrote, “Not sure if it was #COVID19 or something else, but I’ve caught the worst flu ever at #CES2020.”

On Friday, @tarahaelle wrote: “Until we have more antibody tests that have been validated, I’m remaining cautiously skeptical about what conclusions we can draw about positive results we’re hearing about. But I’m as curious as anyone whether the #CES2020 #flu was actually #COVID19.”
https://www.reviewjournal.com/busin...orts-positive-covid-19-antibody-test-2014973/

I would note only that if people who contract the disease has had contact only with people they know, contact tracing is relatively easy. But if the disease is the result of contacts as a major tech conference, a rock concert or the New York subway, it is essentially impossible.
 
So what’s your point?
are you looking for someone to blame?
This pandemic started in San Francisco.

Actually it started in China.

I agree the population in NY City is
immense and I agree it’s devasted NY as a
city and state but at this point does it matter?
Maybe we ship all the sick to New York and rope
it off!
Or is this something more nefarious like.... Cuomo?
Whatever you want to blame this on doesn’t matter
does it?

I would merely point out that it was you who was saying that it was reckless for states like Oklahoma to reopen this quickly. In the meantime, Cuomo is making plans to reopen New York.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...ts-367-new-virus-deaths-lowest-since-march-31

What do you think about that? (I mean, after all, deaths have dropped to 367 per day.)

It’s here and scientist still don’t understand why or
how the virus kills.
although I’ve heard someone already claim they should
have a vaccine for this virus in six months, I’m calling BS on that.

Not sure why you would say that. They know. The coronavirus can kill when it is able to invade the epithelial cells that line and protect the respiratory tract. Also secondary problems such as pneumonia can be the result of the attack. Sometimes the immune system itself is too robust and contributes to the death.

Regarding a possible vaccine, I think it will happen sooner than they will admit just yet: perhaps as soon as this fall. They certainly don't want to be wrong the wrong way.
 
Open up the country

If you want to stay home fine.

I’m getting paid to work not sit on my ass.

It’s going to take a cinder block to fall on your head to realize what’s going on around you....

Wash your hands, common sense Let’s GO!
 
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/28/coronavirus-hype-biggest-political-hoax-in-history/
POLITICS CULTURE NEWS OPINION WORLD SECURITY SPORTS SPECIAL REPORTS Washington Times - Politics, Breaking News, US and World News logo

Coronavirus hype biggest political hoax in history
In this April 16, 2020, photo a gloved hand points to a holding cell at the hospital ward of the Twin Towers jail in Los Angeles. Across the country first responders who've fallen ill from COVID-19, recovered have begun the harrowing experience of returning to jobs that put them back on the front lines of America's fight against the novel coronavirus. (AP Photo/Chris Carlson)
In this April 16, 2020, photo a gloved hand points to a holding cell at the hospital ward of the Twin Towers jail in Los Angeles. Across the country first responders who’ve fallen ill from COVID-19, recovered have begun the ...
By Cheryl K. Chumley - The Washington Times - Tuesday, April 28, 2020
ANALYSIS/OPINION:

The new coronavirus is real.

The response to the coronavirus is hyped. And in time, this hype will be revealed as politically hoaxed.

In fact, COVID-19 will go down as one of the political world’s biggest, most shamefully overblown, overhyped, overly and irrationally inflated and outright deceptively flawed responses to a health matter in American history, one that was carried largely on the lips of medical professionals who have no business running a national economy or government.




TOP ARTICLES
2/5
Michael McCaul calls for
investigation into China, WHO handling of coronavirus in early stages


The facts are this: COVID-19 is a real disease that sickens some, proves fatal to others, mostly the elderly — and does nothing to the vast majority.

That’s it.

That, in a nutshell, is it.

Or, in the words of Dan Erickson and Artin Massih, doctors and co-owners of Accelerated Urgent Care in Bakersfield, California: Let’s get the country reopened — and now.

“Do we need to still shelter in place? Our answer is emphatically no. Do we need businesses to be shut down? Emphatically no. … [T]he data is showing it’s time to lift,” Ericksonsaid, in a recent interview.


He’s right. They’re right.

The data to keep America closed and Americans closed in simply doesn’t exist.

If truth be told, it’s questionable it ever did.

The scientists leading the coronavirus shutdown charge predicted in March that in America, between 100,000 and 250,000 would die. They based those estimates on computer modeling.

But at the same time they were basing those estimates on computer modeling, they were acknowledging that computer modeling is inaccurate and errs on the side of hype.

Have Any of These 41 Items? You Could Be Rich
JOL

“I’ve never seen a model of the diseases I’ve dealt with where the worst-case actually came out,” said Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and a member of President Donald Trump’s White House coronavirus task force, during a CNN interview in March. “They always overshoot.”

Catch that? Fauci’s message: Computer models are flawed and inaccurate and always overestimate the problem.

But from these faulty overinflated computer figures came all the constitutionally questionable actions by government anyway — from ordering businesses closed to quarantining-slash-house arresting American citizens to doing some quick and pitiful and economically painful income redistribution schemes via stimulus funds’ legislation.


Since, about 56,000 have died in America due to coronavirus — or have they? Again, the facts are flimsy.

MORE IN HOME

Wuhan lab ‘most likely’ coronavirus source, U.S. government analysis finds

Trump to use sanctuary city ‘adjustments’ as condition for Dems’ next relief bill

New ‘hot spots’ emerge even as coronavirus curve flattens

Tara Reade claims reinforce Biden’s ‘creeper’ image, undercut campaign

EXCLUSIVE: Blagojevich: Trump saved ‘millions of lives’ with virus response
Government ordered hospitals weeks ago to stop performing elective surgeries to make way for the projected numbers of coronavirus patients. So they did. And in so doing, they cut off their revenue streams. So Congress passed legislation giving hospitals billions of dollars to treat coronavirus patients. Conflict of interest? Yikes. Yes.

The coronavirus counts, already flawed from computer modeling, were then given another flaw treatment.


“[Pennsylvania] removes more than 200 deaths from official coronavirus count as questions mount about reporting process, data accuracy,” The Inquirer reported.

Add to that the ever-changing nature of a virus that spreads by air and contact, and honestly, suddenly, even expert Fauci’s best guess is about as good as Joe Neighbor’s best guess. So that leaves common sense, combined with knowledge of past viruses, to guide.

But the quote-unquote medical experts refused to go there, refused to acknowledge common sense, refused to compare with past viruses in any way that didn’t hype the coronavirus counts.


This virus was different, Americans were told. This virus was far more contagious than anything ever before seen or studied, Americans were told. And any time the case counts dropped off and the numbers proved wrong, well, this was due to the social distancing and quarantining and face-mask wearing that Americans had been doing, by government’s order — Americans were told.

It just didn’t make sense.

It just doesn’t add up.


It just didn’t, and doesn’t, justify the utter shredding of civil rights.

And now some in the medical community, thank goodness, are starting to point out the glaring omissions of logic and fact that have plagued this overhyped, overreaching coronavirus crackdown that has stretched on far, far too long.

Among some of Erickson’s remarks: “This is immunology — microbiology 101. This is the basis of what we’ve known for years: When you take human beings and you say, ‘Go into your house, clean all your counters, Lysol them down’ … what does it do to our immune system? … Sheltering in place decreases your immune system.”


And this: “Any time you have something new in the [medical] community, it sparks fear — and I would have done what Dr. Fauci did … initially. … But you know, looking at theories and models — which is what these folks use — is very different than the way the actual virus presents itself throughout communities.”

And this: “Do you think you’re protected from COVID when you wear gloves that transfer disease everywhere? … We wear masks in an acute setting to protect us. [But] we’re not wearing masks. Why is that? Because we understand microbiology. We understand immunology. And we want strong immune systems. I don’t want to hide in my home, develop a weak immune system and then come out and get disease.”


And this: “When I’m writing up my death report I’m being pressured to add COVID. Why is that? Why are we being pressured to add COVID? To maybe increase the numbers, and make it look a little bit worse than it is. We’re being pressured in-house to add COVID to the diagnostic list when we think it has nothing to do with the actual cause of death. The actual cause of death was not COVID, but it’s being reported as one of the diseases processes. … COVID didn’t kill them, 25 years of tobacco use killed.”


Does it get any clearer than that?

Seriously, America. The only reason America is still in shutdown mode is political.

Either politicians are too afraid to make any move that might come back to bite them politically or politicians are using this coronavirus to political advantage — to, say, pass gun control laws, like Virginia’s governor, Ralph Northam. Or to, say, float campaign hopes on the current ravaged economy, like former Vice President Joe Biden and oh, all the Democrats facing races.


But for the rest of America — the rest of hardworking, freedom-loving America — it’s time to reel in the radically unconstitutional.

“If you’re going to dance on someone’s constitutional rights, you better have a good reason — you better have a really good reason, not just a theory,” Erickson said. “The data is showing us it’s time to lift … so if we don’t lift, what is the reason?”

That is the key question.


As time goes by, the answer will only become more and more evident. The coronavirus may be real — but the hype is hoaxed. Now let’s just hope this is a one-time hoax that doesn’t roll around every time flu season approaches.

• Cheryl Chumley can be reached at [email protected] or on Twitter, @ckchumley. Listen to her podcast “Bold and Blunt” by clicking HERE. And never miss her column; subscribe to her newsletter by clicking HERE.


Copyright © 2020 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.

RECOMMENDEDFEEDNETWORK

Comment
 
Last edited:
I hope you are right. the more I read the less hope I see.

Perhaps this will renew your hope:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/oxford...ccine-widely-available-by-september-covid-19/

It may not work. Who knows? But the race is certainly on to find a vaccine.

Also note that the main delay involves ethics rules which, as a general principle, forbid deliberately infecting humans with a serious disease. Therefore you can't just inject the vaccine into 500 people and then expose them to the virus to see if they get sick. Therefore the only standard way to prove that a vaccine works is to inoculate an appropriate number of people (and a comparable number with a placebo) in a place where the virus is spreading naturally around them.

However, in the case of a worldwide pandemic, one would think that the concept of the greater good would permit a waiver for this concern. Find a thousand people in good health who would volunteer for the test and inoculate 500 with the real thing and 500 with a placebo in a double blind test with adequate compensation and safeguards and then expose them to the virus. Shouldn't be hard to find. Such a test could theoretically be completed in a matter of weeks.

I think this should be permissible particularly if the best possible care is arranged for all who contract the disease.
 
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/28/coronavirus-hype-biggest-political-hoax-in-history/
POLITICS CULTURE NEWS OPINION WORLD SECURITY SPORTS SPECIAL REPORTS Washington Times - Politics, Breaking News, US and World News logo

Coronavirus hype biggest political hoax in history
In this April 16, 2020, photo a gloved hand points to a holding cell at the hospital ward of the Twin Towers jail in Los Angeles. Across the country first responders who've fallen ill from COVID-19, recovered have begun the harrowing experience of returning to jobs that put them back on the front lines of America's fight against the novel coronavirus. (AP Photo/Chris Carlson)
In this April 16, 2020, photo a gloved hand points to a holding cell at the hospital ward of the Twin Towers jail in Los Angeles. Across the country first responders who’ve fallen ill from COVID-19, recovered have begun the ...
By Cheryl K. Chumley - The Washington Times - Tuesday, April 28, 2020
ANALYSIS/OPINION:

The new coronavirus is real.

The response to the coronavirus is hyped. And in time, this hype will be revealed as politically hoaxed.

In fact, COVID-19 will go down as one of the political world’s biggest, most shamefully overblown, overhyped, overly and irrationally inflated and outright deceptively flawed responses to a health matter in American history, one that was carried largely on the lips of medical professionals who have no business running a national economy or government.




TOP ARTICLES
2/5
Michael McCaul calls for
investigation into China, WHO handling of coronavirus in early stages


The facts are this: COVID-19 is a real disease that sickens some, proves fatal to others, mostly the elderly — and does nothing to the vast majority.

That’s it.

That, in a nutshell, is it.

Or, in the words of Dan Erickson and Artin Massih, doctors and co-owners of Accelerated Urgent Care in Bakersfield, California: Let’s get the country reopened — and now.

“Do we need to still shelter in place? Our answer is emphatically no. Do we need businesses to be shut down? Emphatically no. … [T]he data is showing it’s time to lift,” Ericksonsaid, in a recent interview.


He’s right. They’re right.

The data to keep America closed and Americans closed in simply doesn’t exist.

If truth be told, it’s questionable it ever did.

The scientists leading the coronavirus shutdown charge predicted in March that in America, between 100,000 and 250,000 would die. They based those estimates on computer modeling.

But at the same time they were basing those estimates on computer modeling, they were acknowledging that computer modeling is inaccurate and errs on the side of hype.

Have Any of These 41 Items? You Could Be Rich
JOL

“I’ve never seen a model of the diseases I’ve dealt with where the worst-case actually came out,” said Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and a member of President Donald Trump’s White House coronavirus task force, during a CNN interview in March. “They always overshoot.”

Catch that? Fauci’s message: Computer models are flawed and inaccurate and always overestimate the problem.

But from these faulty overinflated computer figures came all the constitutionally questionable actions by government anyway — from ordering businesses closed to quarantining-slash-house arresting American citizens to doing some quick and pitiful and economically painful income redistribution schemes via stimulus funds’ legislation.


Since, about 56,000 have died in America due to coronavirus — or have they? Again, the facts are flimsy.

MORE IN HOME

Wuhan lab ‘most likely’ coronavirus source, U.S. government analysis finds

Trump to use sanctuary city ‘adjustments’ as condition for Dems’ next relief bill

New ‘hot spots’ emerge even as coronavirus curve flattens

Tara Reade claims reinforce Biden’s ‘creeper’ image, undercut campaign

EXCLUSIVE: Blagojevich: Trump saved ‘millions of lives’ with virus response
Government ordered hospitals weeks ago to stop performing elective surgeries to make way for the projected numbers of coronavirus patients. So they did. And in so doing, they cut off their revenue streams. So Congress passed legislation giving hospitals billions of dollars to treat coronavirus patients. Conflict of interest? Yikes. Yes.

The coronavirus counts, already flawed from computer modeling, were then given another flaw treatment.


“[Pennsylvania] removes more than 200 deaths from official coronavirus count as questions mount about reporting process, data accuracy,” The Inquirer reported.

Add to that the ever-changing nature of a virus that spreads by air and contact, and honestly, suddenly, even expert Fauci’s best guess is about as good as Joe Neighbor’s best guess. So that leaves common sense, combined with knowledge of past viruses, to guide.

But the quote-unquote medical experts refused to go there, refused to acknowledge common sense, refused to compare with past viruses in any way that didn’t hype the coronavirus counts.


This virus was different, Americans were told. This virus was far more contagious than anything ever before seen or studied, Americans were told. And any time the case counts dropped off and the numbers proved wrong, well, this was due to the social distancing and quarantining and face-mask wearing that Americans had been doing, by government’s order — Americans were told.

It just didn’t make sense.

It just doesn’t add up.


It just didn’t, and doesn’t, justify the utter shredding of civil rights.

And now some in the medical community, thank goodness, are starting to point out the glaring omissions of logic and fact that have plagued this overhyped, overreaching coronavirus crackdown that has stretched on far, far too long.

Among some of Erickson’s remarks: “This is immunology — microbiology 101. This is the basis of what we’ve known for years: When you take human beings and you say, ‘Go into your house, clean all your counters, Lysol them down’ … what does it do to our immune system? … Sheltering in place decreases your immune system.”


And this: “Any time you have something new in the [medical] community, it sparks fear — and I would have done what Dr. Fauci did … initially. … But you know, looking at theories and models — which is what these folks use — is very different than the way the actual virus presents itself throughout communities.”

And this: “Do you think you’re protected from COVID when you wear gloves that transfer disease everywhere? … We wear masks in an acute setting to protect us. [But] we’re not wearing masks. Why is that? Because we understand microbiology. We understand immunology. And we want strong immune systems. I don’t want to hide in my home, develop a weak immune system and then come out and get disease.”


And this: “When I’m writing up my death report I’m being pressured to add COVID. Why is that? Why are we being pressured to add COVID? To maybe increase the numbers, and make it look a little bit worse than it is. We’re being pressured in-house to add COVID to the diagnostic list when we think it has nothing to do with the actual cause of death. The actual cause of death was not COVID, but it’s being reported as one of the diseases processes. … COVID didn’t kill them, 25 years of tobacco use killed.”


Does it get any clearer than that?

Seriously, America. The only reason America is still in shutdown mode is political.

Either politicians are too afraid to make any move that might come back to bite them politically or politicians are using this coronavirus to political advantage — to, say, pass gun control laws, like Virginia’s governor, Ralph Northam. Or to, say, float campaign hopes on the current ravaged economy, like former Vice President Joe Biden and oh, all the Democrats facing races.


But for the rest of America — the rest of hardworking, freedom-loving America — it’s time to reel in the radically unconstitutional.

“If you’re going to dance on someone’s constitutional rights, you better have a good reason — you better have a really good reason, not just a theory,” Erickson said. “The data is showing us it’s time to lift … so if we don’t lift, what is the reason?”

That is the key question.


As time goes by, the answer will only become more and more evident. The coronavirus may be real — but the hype is hoaxed. Now let’s just hope this is a one-time hoax that doesn’t roll around every time flu season approaches.

• Cheryl Chumley can be reached at [email protected] or on Twitter, @ckchumley. Listen to her podcast “Bold and Blunt” by clicking HERE. And never miss her column; subscribe to her newsletter by clicking HERE.


Copyright © 2020 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.

RECOMMENDEDFEEDNETWORK

Comment
DK

Be careful when posting opinion pieces.
If it was an opinion piece from the NYT I’d refuse to read it lol.

Things are
Shifting but it is a virus.

That we know. Common sense, wash your hands and stay off social media.

That’s just a start lol.
 
Dr Frankenstein

Thanks good news
Won't bore you with any bad news at this time.

I think this should be permissible particularly if the best possible care is arranged for all who contract the disease.
Thank You Dr Frankenstein LMAO

with adequate compensation
Never heard of that happening... just saying
 
Never heard of that happening... just saying

What would be adequate compensation to get the volunteers you need? Half of your test subjects would receive a placebo so it would have to be fairly significant I would think.

Note that it would also involve isolation after exposure to the virus, presumably in a hospital, where the patient could be monitored.

And it would likely represent an ordeal regardless which group one was in. On the other hand, in addition to a financial remuneration, there would be the satisfaction of doing one's bit for science and humanity.

What do you think?
 

Just a couple of observations:

In a statement, YouTube said in part, “We quickly remove flagged content that violate our Community Guidelines, including content that explicitly disputes the efficacy of local healthy authority recommended guidance on social distancing that may lead others to act against that guidance….From the very beginning of the pandemic, we’ve had clear policies against COVID-19 misinformation and are committed to continue providing timely and helpful information at this critical time.”

The YouTube comment suggest that the video was taken down due to misinformation. I listened to the videos carefully and I did not note any misinformation. What I heard was a description of collected data and conclusions from the data that did not correspond to conventional authority.

Dr. Erickson mentioned a comparison of Norway with Sweden in which we have two Scandinavian countries: one has about twice the population but is otherwise similar except that one did the lockdown and one did not. I thought that was interesting so I collected the data from the past 10 days for direct comparison:

Sweden 10.1 M (no lockdown)
Date...…….Cases New C Deaths New D
4/18/2020 13,822 606 1,511 111
4/19/2020 14,385 563 1,540 29
4/20/2020 14,777 392 1,580 40
4/21/2020 15,322 545 1,765 185
4/22/2020 16,004 682 1,937 172
4/23/2020 16,755 751 2,021 84
4/24/2020 17,567 812 2,152 131
4/25/2020 18,177 610 2,192 40
4/26/2020 18,640 463 2,194 2
4/27/2020 18,926 286 2,274 80
4/28/2020 19,621 695 2,355 81

Norway 5.3 M (lockdown)
Date...…….Cases New C Deaths New D
4/18/2020 7,036 99 164 3
4/19/2020 7,078 42 165 1
4/20/2020 7,156 78 181 16
4/21/2020 7,241 85 182 1
4/22/2020 7,338 97 187 5
4/23/2020 7,401 63 194 7
4/24/2020 7,463 62 199 5
4/25/2020 7,493 30 201 2
4/26/2020 7,527 34 201 0
4/27/2020 7,599 72 205 4
4/28/2020 7,660 61 206 1

It is interesting that while Norway has about half the number of cases overall which corresponds to having about half the population, they have reported only about a tenth of the number of deaths. It seems likely to me that this is due to differences in reporting, but since there are a number of variables, other possible explanations exists. Also, while the overall number of cases seem to correspond, the recent cases are significantly greater indicating that Norway may have had a greater problem early on which precipitated the lockdown in Norway. More complete data might be able to clear that up. Unfortunately I do not have that data.

Regardless, I see no reason that this point of view should be excluded from the conversation. It appears to be a good faith effort to present the data and draw a conclusion. If someone can show me what they think is misinformation, I would be glad to review it, however.

Something that Dr. Erickson said in regard to the lockdown that I thought was interesting: "Big businesses are open, little businesses are not. There is no science behind that."
 
Last edited:
Morbidity's

After watch both parts of the video. It reminded me of the bookkeeper saying" you give me the numbers and tell me what you want them to say.. or something like that.

It boiled down to me that they were honest reporters. but ones who had seen a lot of people die. that hardens you or you go into another line of work. they said like most Dr's that 96 out of 100 people were going to be fine who got the virus. along with saying most of the 4 who died had other underlining conditions. (morbidity's)

But yet that argument I'll counter with this. if I had got the virus back 6 weeks ago and died after 2 weeks. he said my morbidity's killed me not the virus. I say: here I am still with my morbidity's. heck I'm just curious how long I can live with with my morbidity's. fuck off corona

That said banning the video was BS. we need some other outlet where a video like this will not be banned. it's just another take on a issue.
 
They went out of their lane a few times. that imo hurts not help's their credibility. it was their 15 minutes lol

Didn't bother me a bit. Their main objective is the reopening of business in California. I don't see the problem with pointing out that big business is already open--just not small business. I didn't see it as being out of their lane.

They also pointing out some inconsistencies in the current policy such as you can go to a store like Costco or Lowes and shop with other customers but according to the policy you're not allowed to go for a walk in the park. Part of their argument is that going outside is healthy and that the current policy in California of telling people to stay inside is counterproductive. I happen to agree with them.
 
Team human

Was trying my best to be objective with Dr Dan Erickson and Artin Massihi. they are 2 frustrated people. losing money in their businesses. I agreed with most of what they said.
we all have skin in the game.

The not wearing a mask thing was just .... come on man. this is a serious virus. we as people don't go around slapping each other in the face. even to people that deserve it. a simple thing of wearing a mask or not could seriously kill some one. smh
I would wear one if I was 12 to 40 years old etc. I'm on team human. I'll ask this: if we had all started wearing them in Feb and it only saved 3 peoples lives. would it been worth the inconvenience ?
 
South Korea says recovered coronavirus patients who tested positive again did not relapse: Tests picked up 'dead virus fragments'

Virus apparently reactivated in S. Korea's 1st reinfection case: experts
SEOUL, March 1
https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20200301004000320


Recovered coronavirus patients are testing positive again. Can you get reinfected?
April 18, 2020
https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/17/health/south-korea-coronavirus-retesting-positive-intl-hnk/index.html
https://www.businessinsider.com/cor...activated-cases-not-reinfected-experts-2020-4

This is good News
 
Can some of you brainiacs kindly explain to me exactly why?
Exactly why did China stop incoming air traffic passengers during the pandemic crisis " without stopping outgoing air traffic passengers "??
Inquiring minds wanna know??
 
Back
Top Bottom